The Mahabharata

A showcase for the oldest and longest epic in the world. A resource for the better understanding of all aspects ofSanatana Dharma, Vedanta and Yoga.A place for West to meet and embrace East beyond cliché, presumption and prejudice.

Monday, November 28, 2011

Not Just for Scholars...


The Myths of Mankind video series was something of a marathon ride. In the next few weeks I'll return to discuss some of the issues brought up in the documentary. But for the time being -- if you got the impression that the Mahabharata is just for Vedic scholars, historians, archeologists, anthropologists and other terribly, terribly deep and serious people you'd be very wrong.

What I've left unsaid till now is this: reading the Mahabharata is hugely, delightfully entertaining! It's an absolutely fun read, and it's amazing to see what a great sense of humour its author or authors had in composing it. Take, for instance, Arjuna's year incognito in the court of Vitara. He's been cursed by a beautiful celestial dancer -- an apsara -- to be eunuch for a year -- what better disguise! So Arjuna hangs out in the women's quarters: Arjuna, the greatest warrior, the archetypical alpha male, dressed as a woman!
"... golden earrings dangled from his ears; womanly garments covered his hard muscles and scarred shoulders, so that he appeared as a woman and not as a man. His voice taking on a high womanly pitch, Arjuna delighted the young unmarried maidens with his jokes and stories -- but most especially Uttara, Virata's daughter, who flushed in delight and giggled at his clownish antics. When Arjuna teased the maidens they squealed in merriment and loved him, and never had the women's quarters known such frolicsome days." (from Sons of Gods: the Mahabharata retold)

But then, the Kauravas attack and Arjuna is forced to fight. He has great fun pretending to be useless, putting on his armour back to front and protesting that all he's good for is song and dance.

And then, the great reveal....
Humour is really timeless. The Mahabharata proves it. If we can laugh at the same things that people 50 centuries ago found funny then surely that's proof of the golden thread that binds all humans together. Whether you're 9 or 99: the Mahabharata story is about you. Because it's about the quintessential human spirit, a timeless entity that is as much a part of us today as it was at the dawn of civilisation, beyond change, beyond trends, beyond time and place.

Myths of Mankind: The Mahabharata, Part Six

Vedas , Astronomy and Spirituality: is the Word mightier than Stone?
"In the incredible age of Indian civilisation new evidence arises from the one intact source of Indian records so far overlooked: the fact that the word may be mightier than rock. Generations upon generations have passed down the poem before it was written down, the verses remembered with uncanny precision through intricate exercise."
………............................................................................................
"Oral tradition, the words themselves, may have carved a monument that withstands the ages better than rock, that is lost when it is written down; for it goes by the ear, by the rhythm of the heart. The sound silences the mind. It stills all thought: but as the book says, make one mistake, that’s when the snake strikes: when the ear hears. Oral tradition needed no written records. If it could be remembered faultlessly for a thousand years, why not for thousands, or more?"
……................................................................................................
"If the Mahabharata has one message to deliver it is that man should most concern himself with inner peace and real happiness which do not lie here in this world. It’s through understanding this that one grasps the essence of Indian thought.
"The indifference to material possessions evinced by so many here and deemed almost a crime in the west stems from the knowledge that whatever one gains in this world is lost the moment the body is burns to earth, melts and vanishes into air So why concern oneself too much with ephemeral things? It may be a recipe for poverty, but t also one for the kind of riches you can take with you.
"It is there also where lies the greatness of the Mahabharata."
…................................................................................
"Spiritual science it seems, the precise technique of self realisation and liberation, has been a part of Indian society from the very start. Just as those new soldiers and civil servants of empire were told , who understands this understands everything about India, and those who fail to understand it will never understand anything about her."

Myths of Mankind: The Mahabharata, Part Five

Destiny and Free Will: is Paradise open to dogs? (watch the video below for the answer!)

“'You must learn to see with the same eye a mound of earth, a heap of gold, a cow, a sage, a dog, and the man who eats the dog. There’s another intelligence beyond the mind.' Krishna in Peter Brook’s Mahabharata.
'Dharma belies the Western criticism of Hindu thought: that it leaves precious little room for free will, that it binds man upon a wheel of fate, a wheel of reincarnation, rebirth; a wheel that goes round and round and round and round and round.
'Dharma offers the escape from the fate of reincarnation; it is the path detached from this world of illusion, to the quintessential truth which Hinduism seeks.
“'From a western point of view it’s impossible to understand that fate, destiny and free will can coexist. Everything in the western mind says if there is fate there isn’t free will, if there’s free will there can’t be such a things as fate or destiny. The Mahabharata cuts that away and puts one in front of something very different, in that freedom exists in a quite different way and that one sees that the great freedom for each character is either to become himself or not to become himself.' Peter Brook, director, The Mahabharata.
It is with this detachment that Arjuna can sound the horn even for the horrors of the coming war. The Pandavas win eventually, but it is a victory that is to deeply trouble them.
"'Every rule is broken. Every single value is destroyed there is no difference left between the people who are good and the people who are evil; there is no difference left between who is the enemy and who is not.' Mallika Sarabhai.
No one can calm the sense of wrongfulness in the mind of Yudhisthira, now king.




“That one work can contain both so much wisdom and entertainment after several millennia is mind boggling and without comparison. If Homer’s Iliad could also contain the New Testament and was as popular today as it was 2000 years ago, even this would not compare with the poem attributed to Vyasa. By comparison Shakespeare himself seems like a lightweight, and indeed, all literary fame pales.
“We find it hard to believe that anything of such magnificence could be a legacy from a time before history began, but in the West our scholars have looked for the cradles of civilisation closer to home. To us India is a mere footnote to history. We require hard evidence, documents, records. And unlike Egypt or Mesopotamia where nothing will decay the Indian climate ensures than nothing, not even the hardest stone carvings, will survive much beyond one millennium.
“But could we be wrong? Instead of a footnote, should India be one of the main chapters of the history books?”

Sunday, November 27, 2011

Myths of Mankind: The Mahabharata. Part Four

Mythology and Religion

"Indian mythology is like a mirror that shows their hearts' desire to all who look into it. So the Hindu in his shrine might greet you with : 'So you are a follower of this Jesus, brought his image with you! He is very nice too! Put him up there too in the shrine, there’s plenty of room!'

"It is so because the original idea was never abandoned; it was merely enlarged, expanded upon for every imaginable taste. To this day though, in his heart, the Hindu really only believes in One ineffable God, creator of everything, to whom everything returns. Not the Christian father high up in heaven but inside us, everywhere, in all.
Sometimes this One is known as Para Atman, whereas the individual soul is atman. Para means supreme: the Supreme Soul.

"Our mind, our senses, separate us from that Soul. Our desires with which we shape the world around us distance us from the divine. So desire triggers the actions that shape reality but desires can never be satisfied, because they are illusory: what is called Maya, illusion, that is both the architect and the substance of this world."

From: Myths of Mankind: The Mahabharata, Part 4

Myths of Mankind: The Mahabharata Part Three

Archaeology (con'd) and Hinduism

Link
"The quintessence of India, her religion, has remained unchanged ever since the great poem was composed. No invader or coloniser was ever able to overcome it, and indeed many, like the Aryan invaders form the north, were overcome by it, absorbed into its generous complexities.

"Jews were here since the times of king Solomon. India has the distinction of being the only country on earth where they were never persecuted. Almost every religions faith of the world was represented, like Islam in huge numbers, Christians numbering millions; and out of Hinduism have come reforms, movements like Buddhism that became major religions in their own right. But the Indian soul was never been conquered. Vedas and Mahabharata spring from an ancient and enduring civilisation, the scope of which we are only now beginning to fathom."






"The root of Hinduism is not just in the belief in one God, like the monotheism of Christians and Moslems, but that there is nothing in existence besides this One God. God is not only in everything and everyone, he literally is everything. For, asks the Mahabharata, is the drop of rain in essence any different from the vast ocean into which it falls and vanishes? If God is all he is in us, and we are he. Man's quest, therefore, is for the divine within to become part of all, part of God.
"At its core (Hinduism) is more of a philosophy than what we in the West would call a religion. It was out of this philosophy, too austere, intellectually taxing for most, that was born the bewildering diversity of India’s estimated 26 million gods and goddesses.

Saturday, November 26, 2011

Myths of Mankind: The Mahabharata. Part Two

Film and Archaeology
From the documentary:
"Children in School, for example: if there is one child who is very strong or very fat they will say he is exactly like Bhima. And that is the kind of total liveability and contemporariness of the Mahabharata today." Mallika Sarabhai, as Draupadi in Peter Brook's miniseries, The Mahabharata.

But a Bhima played by an actor from Africa?

Director Peter Brook staged the Mahabharata with actors from around the world, making the Mahabharata accessible to people everywhere.

"In all my conversations with Peter I have often asked him why he works with an international group and one of the things he has said is that if in a small group of mixed races and countries we can create something that is harmonious, then the world has a chance. The Mahabharata cuts across everything. It cuts across time, race, colour. It’s the same issues that have continue to face human beings over millennia." -- Mallika Sarabhai
From: Myths of India: The Mahabharata. Part Two




From the documentary:
Our ignorance of the vast age of India’s civilisation was due.. to a tendency to view Europe, our world, as the heart of life on earth, an expedient that was self serving during the heady days of empire.
"We still think that all other civilisations were of minor quality, and that is why we still have difficulties accepting that in the Indian subcontinent something developed that was even more important than the other civilisations. " -- Michael Jansen, architectural history.

From:
Myths of India: The Mahabharata. Part Two


Friday, November 25, 2011

Myths of Mankind: The Mahabharata. Part One

Here's a great documentary series on the Mahabharata, exploring it in the context of India's history, archeology, sociology etc.Young officers or civil servants arriving for the first time in their new home among the palm fronds and rice fields, or in the heat and dust of a desert cantonment, would commonly be told by some well-meaning old India hand that if they wished to grasp the essence of the place and its people they should read one book: the Mahabharata, the world’s oldest epic by far, and with 90000 verses exceeding the Bible and all of Shakespeare’s plays bundled together by far the world’s longest and greatest epic poem."

From "Myths of India,: The Mahabharata. Part 1".


But why should modern readers, living in the West and eons away from India both in terms of mileage and mentality, want to read a book written centuries ago? What could such a book possibly have to say to them? Why should they pick it up, if there was no previous particular interest in India or its culture?

To this I say: because the story is timeless, and speaks to a dimension of the human spirit that is equally timeless, and behind the action lie themes that are as much a part of the human situation today as they were those 50 centuries ago in a far-off land. Values, that we cherish as much today as did the mythical heroes of this grand story: loyalty, friendship, truth, love, bravery. The "character flaws that drive the action in this story are as much alive today as they were: greed, envy, jealousy, lust, covetousness, betrayal, addiction...

It is a story larger than life, and as relevant to modern day America or Europe as to ancient -- or for that matter modern -- India.
If you have the time, watch the video below. The whole documentary series can be watched on this site:

Myths of India: The Mahabharata





Tuesday, November 22, 2011

Many Mahabharatas

The "Great Bharata" of Vyasa comprises over 100,000 Sanskrit stanzas organized into eighteen volumes. With about 1.8 million words in total, the Mahabharata is one of the longest epic poems in the world, about ten times the size of the Iliad and the Odyssey combined, roughly five times longer than Dante's Divine Comedy, and about four times the size of the other Indian epic, the Ramayana.

 Within this vastness lies a net of countless stories, one story leading into another and that into another, a veritable mine of ancient Hindu folktales, myths and legends that serve to illuminate the ancient Hindu concept of dharma and adharma: righteous, dutiful, virtuous, wise living versus unrighteous, ignorant living. At its core is the conflict between the Kauravas and the Pandavas, two rival branches of the Lunar clan, culminating in the horrific civil war on the battlefield of Kurukshetra, a holocaust which wiped out the entire warrior caste and ushered in the degenerate Fourth Age of Mankind, in which we are all living today.

There have been many attempts to unravel the Mahabharata’s historical growth and layers of composition . Its authorship is traditionally attributed to Vyasa, an itinerant naked sage who himself appears as a character within the story. Its earliest layers probably date back to the late Vedic period, around the 8th century BC, and it probably reached its final form by the time the Gupta period which began in the 4th century CE. Over the centuries it spread and grew both in Sanskrit and in translation into other languages of India, both through oral tradition and in writing.
With each retelling new digressions and diversions were added on. Hundreds of other stories and philosophical discussions attached themselves to it; Sanskrit scholars and village storytellers contributed to it, adding jewels to the vast mosaic, so that it became a great compendium of myth, folklore and moral theory.

There are many English versions available today, which can basically be divided into translations, condensations, and their hybrid, condensed translations. The most well-known of the translations is the Victorian prose version by Kisari Mohan Ganguli, published between 1883 and 1896 (Munshiram Manoharlal Publishers). The complete 18-volume text is available online, free, here.

Countless authors have attempted the task of paring the vast work down to a readable size, their chief mission being the decision what to leave out, what to include, and what, if anything, to change or add on. These condensations vary in length between J. A. B. Van Buitenan's three-volume version (1981; University of Chicago Press), Ramesh Menon’s two-volume version (2004; Rupa & Co) and several longer or shorter one-volume editions. 

 Some are scholarly works with many annotations; some are popular versions; some are children's books; some are comics. Some are little more than summaries, the bare bones of the story with no attempt at dramatisation, characterisation or embellishment. Some go further, the author fleshing out the skeleton and dressing the basic plot with new details from his or her imagination.
This new interpretation fits comfortably and unashamedly into the last category.


Monday, November 21, 2011

The Spirit of India

"Only India has preserved the unbroken thread of the human story that binds us all.”

Michael Wood, BBC documentary “The Story of India”.

For 50 centuries the Mahabharata has survived as a cornerstone of Indian culture, loved by hundreds of millions of Hindus as a inexhaustible treasure-house of anecdotes, proverbs and wisdom. Its heroes are held up as standards of dharma, right action; its villains serve as warnings as to the consequences of adharma, wrong action; and it shows the grey area between these two where each individual must make a choice, and live with the results of that decision. It provides a powerful source work for themes in literature, art, drama, dance, song, and, in modern times, film. In it we find history and legend, myth and folklore, fable and parable, philosophy and religion; and last but not least, incredible romance. It’s a book of big ideas, magnificent events, simply a great story. Above all, at its core is the Bhagavad Gita, one of Hinduism’s central scriptures, often called “the fifth Veda”: a fountain of wisdom providing an ethic that has moulded the lives and the mentality of one of the most numerous peoples on earth.

It does this through its gospel of dharma, which runs like a golden thread through all the complex twists and turns in the epic; by its message, through story and characters, that hatred triggers hatred, that greed and violence inevitably lead to ruin; that, finally, the only real victory is in the battle against one’s lower nature; that we must rise above ourselves to be the best that we can be. Into it is woven all the elements of our life on earth, no matter where we may live or to what culture or age we belong; for Truth to be Truth it must be valid for everyone, at all times and all places, above and beyond cultural mores and changing values; it must be independent of trends, for only so can it be truly universal. A book that embeds such lasting truth into a wonderful story can live forever; and that is the secret of the Mahabharata's longevity and value to mankind. W. J. Johnson* has compared its importance to world civilization to that of the Bible, the works of Shakespeare, the works of Homer, Greek drama, and the Qur'an.
Krishna-Dvaipayana, also known as Veda Vyasa, is said to be the author of the original 24,000 slokas (verses); Vyasa is also a character in the book, and, in fact, the biological grandfather of the five Pandava brothers, the heroes of the story. Throughout the epic he makes his cameo appearances, walking into the story as an ugly, naked ascetic covered in ash, and apparently, wearing long dreadlocks. He speaks a few words of wisdom, directs the plot onward (it is Vyasa, for instance, who informs the Pandavas that a bride is waiting for Arjuna at the end of their first exile) and disappears again.
However, it does not seem possible that this vast poem could be the work of one individual; over the centuries, especially in the days when it was passed down orally, many poets and storytellers must have contributed to Vyasa's work.
The Mahabharata spread to become part of the tradition of every corner of India; but it is so powerful it could not be contained in the country of its origin. It has travelled to other Asian countries such as Indonesia, Thailand and Cambodia, and in each different setting it has absorbed some of the flavour of the region. Thus the separate versions of the epic differ from each other; there is not one Mahabharata, but many, though the basic story remains the same: a strong central strand around which innumerable side stories and legends are interwoven to make this epic a vast tapstry of ever-changing nuances.
But the power and appeal of the Mahabharata is not exclusively Asian. This is what Nhilde Davidson of the Northwest Branch of The Theosophical in Washington has to say in his online article A Wonder of Ancient India: The Mahabharata:
“Daunted by its size and a misconception that an intimate understanding of Hinduism was needed, I never considered taking the Mahabharata off the shelf. By accident I tuned into an episode of an Indian television production of the Mahabharata (subtitled in English) -- and I was hooked.
"Ninety-six one-hour episodes later (and many more hours of reading) I am still enthralled and continue delving into this fascinating epic. Its appeal is on many different levels and, through the ages, ascetics and scholars alike have dedicated their lives to studying, collating, and translating the varied and voluminous material. When the series aired on Indian television, railway schedules had to be adjusted as each week almost the entire country sat in front of a TV.
"We all love a hero -- heroic action appeals to children and adults alike -- and these epics are heroic. On a deeper level it is the philosophical depth and the psychological profundity that endure, keeping the stories alive in the soul, drawing one back again and again.”
Thus its spread to the West. Many Sanskrit scholars have attempted the translation into English and other European languages, first and foremost among them the celebrated Ganguli. Others have attempted condensed versions of the epic. Some are mere summaries, with no attempt at dramatisation or characterisation; some have been loosely interpreted, the author adding his or her own imagination to the basic story, in keeping with the oral tradition in which each teller retells the tale in his or her own words and adding new elements to the story. I would like to be part of this tradition.
Some modern Mahabharata writers insist that they do not stray away from the original written text. I make no such claim; I am first and foremost a writer of fiction, basically a storyteller, and in writing this I enjoyed nothing more than the act of getting under a character’s skin, putting words into their mouths and giving them a voice; adding little twists and turns of my own; giving my imagination free rein even as I told the basic central story.
I hope Westerners will enjoy reading this new version as much as I enjoyed writing it.

Tuesday, November 01, 2011

The Cover-- Revealed!




Cover artist: Mu Ramalingkum
Thanks to Laura Burke for donating this beautiful cover design!
About the Mahabharata
The central story of The Mahabharata is straightforward: it’s the age-old theme of good against evil, culminating in a cataclysmic war, the Battle of Kurukshetra. On the “goodie” side are the Pandavas: five brothers “like the five fingers of one hand”, each of them sired by a god, for their mother (and step-mother), Kunti, possesses a powerful Mantra that can summon such a divine being to father her children.
The eldest Pandava is Yudhisthira, a paragon of a king. He is everything the world has ever longed for in a leader: just, unselfish, benevolent, upright, peace-loving, yet, if called for, a great warrior.
But is he also weak? When he is cheated out of his kingdom by his arch-enemy, his wicked cousin Duryodhana, he dithers, unsure of the ethics of war, and it takes his warrior brothers as well as Krishna, the Incarnation of God, to end his agonising. Is war right or wrong? A war against one’s own family, friends, teachers?
Even Arjuna, the middle Pandava and the perfect, invincible warrior, dithers at the last moment, and at this point his friend and charioteer, Krishna, delivers the Bhagavad Gita, the jewel in the crown of The Mahabharata: Yes, fight they must, and to the death.
On the “baddie” side are the Kauravas, led by the wicked Duryodhana and his right-hand man Karna, who goads him on; and the whole world knows that Karna is a greater warrior than Arjuna.
We know from the beginning that the Pandavas must win, because Krishna is on their side. The glory of The Mahabharata is in the details: the divine curses and boons they must overcome, the super-powerful astras (weapons charged with mighty Mantras) hurled against them, invincible enemies such as the illustrious Bhishma, their beloved grandfather, who cannot be killed unless he wants to be killed. Even Krishna’s own army, the Vrishnis, an indestructible force, is on the enemy side. But the Pandavas must win. It is pre-destined. The question is how, against such an unassailable force?
That, in a nutshell, is the core story of the Mahabharata, the story that appears in condensed form in so many different versions, loved and retold by Hindus from time immemorial, yet little-known in the West.